New Utah Pride president promises transparency, change

Netto

Newly-elected Utah Pride President John Netto said he’s never before been scared to be a board chair, but Utah’s gay, lesbian, bisexual transgender and ally community is a “rough crowd.”

He also said he’s up to the job.

Netto spoke to a group of 40 or so community members, Pride board members and staff at a meeting last night held at the Center in response to two layoffs and staff salary and benefit cuts announced at the beginning of the week.

Pride executive director Valarie Larabee, appearing battle-worn, also addressed the crowd.

Netto introduced his history, as a straight man, with Utah’s gay community as beginning when he ran for office for Christine Johnson’s Utah House seat after she announced she was leaving the state. During an event sponsored by Equality Utah, he was impressed by the organization, wrote a check, and became friends with then executive director Michael Thompson.

“I saw this organization that was taking on Utah politicians, and I liked that,” he said. “At the time I heard about the Utah Pride Center, but I thought they were a bit too radical.”

As he heard more about the Center, he decided he liked the “radicalness” of the Center and “wanted to be part of that.” Board president Nikki Boyer invited him to be on the board in 2011, right about the time the decision to purchase the building that currently houses the Center was made.

“I knew there was a $225,000 price tag to design and do demolition of [the interior of] the building, and I knew my company could handle that,” he said.

He said he, personally, took care of the main floor demolition, along with 20 or so of his homeless friends, who he paid out of his pocket. Netto is known as a homeless advocate. In all, he estimates that he donated $300,000 to $400,000 in cash and services to the Center to help with the building.

Netto was elected president of the board in a closed meeting, which involved the replacement of board vice president Jon Jepsen, who had resigned earlier in the month, with Netto, and then the resignation of Nikki Boyer as president, elevating Netto to that position.

“In hindsight, that meeting should have been handled better,” Netto said.

He asked for board member and attorney Jesse Nix to write a whitepaper on whether QSaltLake reporters should have been excluded from the meeting and it was determined that should not have happened.

“That will not happen again,” he said.

Netto admits that mistakes have been made at the Center.

“Mistakes were made; visibility lost; priorities were out of line with the needs of the community; there were unattentive board members,” he said. “Since I was made president, I’ve gotten humdreds of angry emails and my phone has been ringing off the hook. But, what this shows me is that what we are doing matters to people.”

He said that 90 percent of the time, when an organization goes through a crisis and a new president is brought on to right it, the existing executive director is fired. He said he has faith in Larabee’s ability to learn and grow that she is the right person to stay in the job.

“From a practical standpoint, the Center grew under Val from her and one staffer to a staff of 14,” he said. “But what happened was that she lost track of where the Center stopped and where Val started. They became one. When the Center was attacked, Val took it as an attack on her.”

Netto said that he first asked to look at the books and found within a few hours something that a finance committee, an accountant and an auditor missed — over $200,000 allocated as cash on hand that was actually restricted funds for the building. That and other accounting errors added up to a need to cut expenses or dip into their rainy-day fund, which is still happening, but to a smaller degree.

As community members demanded financials, he asked to be allowed some time to go through them fully so he could release numbers that are accurate.

“I would be crucified by this community if I released numbers that ended up being wrong,” he said. He promised the financials within 30 days.

He also promised complete visibility and transparency to the community.

“You have my commitment to a totally transparent Center from this point forward,” he said.

He also said that, while the Center has problems, they are not “life threatening.”

Several board members, staffers and volunteers had approached QSaltLake over the past several weeks to warn of the problems with the center, both in finances and leadership. The strife between board members and Larabee was made public during a disagreement over the Utah Pride Grand Marshal. Efforts were made to remove these board members, and one did eventually resign, but one stayed put.

Netto said that such tactics will no longer be the rule under his leadership.

“I like disagreement,” he said, “and I like those with strong opinions.”

“We need to shift from a private, entrepreneurial organization to an open, community organization,” he said. “Val works at the discretion of the board. The board of directors works at the discretion of you — the community.”

“I am proud of what has been achieved at this Center,” he said. “And I know we can move forward in a better way. We can solve these problems by opening things up.”

He said that, while the community may not know him, he believes in time he will be able to build trust over time.

“We are willing to change the rules of engagement to become a community orgnization,” he said. “I believe the winning formula to achieve this is — with love, for love. You can expect leadership to change here and now.”

He also acknowledges he does not know how to fix the public relations problem the Center has. That, he says, is up to the community.

“Even great leaders make mistakes,” he said. “It is normal and customary in these types of organizations.”

While no “Kumbaya” was sung at the end of the meeting, some left encouraged that the Center would change, some were hopeful, and others were skeptical.

“I would like to thank Valerie Larabee for her willingness to sit and listen with an open heart and mind to our concerns and recommendations,” said Chuck Whyte after the meeting. “With face-to-face communication and total transparency, we will soon be at the mountain top. Long live our community center.”

Recommend to friends
  • gplus
  • pinterest

About the Author

Michael Aaron

Michael Aaron is the editor and publisher of QSaltLake. He has been active in Utah's gay and lesbian community since the early 80s and published two publications then and in the 90s.
  • gplus

Comments

  1. QSalt Lake
    October 31, 2013 at 8:22 pm

    Last night's meeting, part two: New Utah Pride president promises transparency, change

  2. Pingback: SAGE Utah, Utah Pride future 'solid' | Gay Salt Lake - Utah LGBT news, bars, views, arts

  3. Mat Uhl
    October 31, 2013 at 9:44 pm

    I liked it better when i just fuking paid for the damn thing.

  4. Debb Wright
    October 31, 2013 at 10:36 pm

    Oh good. A straight white man is the President of Pride. Welcome to Salt Lake…

  5. Jessica Lee
    October 31, 2013 at 10:37 pm

    *sigh*

  6. Debb Wright
    October 31, 2013 at 10:40 pm

    OMG Isn't that the same guy that sent limos to occupy the day it was shut down?

  7. Christine Leaming
    October 31, 2013 at 10:41 pm

    omfg

  8. Christine Leaming
    October 31, 2013 at 10:41 pm

    what

  9. Christine Leaming
    October 31, 2013 at 10:41 pm

    no

  10. Christine Leaming
    October 31, 2013 at 10:41 pm

    nope.jpg

  11. Doug White
    October 31, 2013 at 10:45 pm

    Some of the tough questions never got asked. Those that were met with a wait and see approach. I find it interesting that the UPC website financials tab show IRS 990's submitted through 2012. But, lacking, are the financial reports from 2007 onward. Seems a lot of broken promises, lack of oversight or just plain don't want to make them public yet.

    And, the website state that the UPC has a nineteen member board but lists only eleven members. Are the remaining positions not filled because they can't find willing members? Who knows.

    Hopefully at a future circle meeting more answers will be forthcoming. There needs to be a healing for the UPC to move forward. Time will tell.

  12. Ben Williams
    October 31, 2013 at 11:58 pm

    At Yesterday's Heart Circle some board members said that if people had complaints why didn't they come to them with their concerns… I submitted that its NOT the community's responsibility to go the board but that its the Board's responsibility to meet with the community. They serve us not we serve them. How would anyone person know that their concerns were truly being listened to and acknowledge with only a one on one? A person could easily be dismissed…But in a meeting where a group is voicing their wants needs and concerns and minutes are being taken at the meeting then at following meetings people would know whether issues were being addressed… Accountability and having a voice…Is that too much to ask from our Community Center officials? If all board members cannot attend and that is a bit to ask then board liaisons and the executive Director should be.

  13. Aisling Pompei
    November 1, 2013 at 1:16 am

    Maybe we're a "rough crowd" because people lump fucking "allies" in with us and make them our leaders. Fuck this, fuck this so hard. And to think that I was just not too long ago complaining about gay cis men being higher ups in the organizations, they've actually managed to do even worse…..

  14. Aisling Pompei
    November 1, 2013 at 1:19 am

    Also, "how radical the organization is"?? LOL, the pride center is about as radical Hot Topic, maybe even less so.

  15. Dominique Storni
    November 1, 2013 at 1:45 am

    " Efforts were made to remove these board members, and one did eventually resign, but one stayed put."

    Same ole, same ole.

    This happened during the hostile take over … errrrr "merger" of Pride and the Gay & Lesibna Community Center of Utah back in the day.
    - Everyone who didn't want the merger was summarily dismissed
    - Media was prohibited from attending (I was covering it for The Pillar and was allowed to attend only 1 meeting)
    - Closed meetings, secret agreements

    If this doesn't change, UPC will render itself irrelevant. It took years to resurrect it last time. How quickly can you either change tactics or close the doors?

    Sorry I missed the meeting.

  16. Dominique Storni
    November 1, 2013 at 1:48 am

    The community hasn't gone to the board, because the community knows that complaints fall on deaf years.

    "Leaders" appear to be more concerned with what I call face-time (how much time can one wrangle in front of a camera), than actually doing what they are there for, to serve the community.

    Same thing happening in local, state, and federal politics. Same thing happening in churches. Same-same in other non-profits.

    And they dare blame the community for not speaking up?

    I call bullshit!!!

  17. Michael Picardi
    November 1, 2013 at 2:19 am

    More and more cheap tricks from the "Pride" center..what are they proud of? Changing the name so younger LGBT kids cannot find the GAY AND LESBIAN center when looking for and needing help..why and how did they decide to buy the palace they now occupy..The infomercial over the weekend about the ramifications regarding DOMA is now made perfectly clear: get the low lifes to pay for all of the information needed from the businesses owned by the Power Fags so they can give that money to the "center"..and then give us back ? what?? The Pride parade? the festival?? where again, all of it is about businesses and making money so those in the pay for gay positions can and will keep their jobs..this is a disgrace and raises many MANY questions about the financial issues surrounding the current/past and present "leadership".

  18. Sydney Van Wagenen
    November 1, 2013 at 9:17 am

    NOPE!

  19. Sharon Selman Foster
    November 4, 2013 at 6:18 pm

    I wish he would have opened the books (as was asked repetedly to do at the OPEN meeting). As THEY WERE FOUND. Not, as he is wanting to CLEAN THEM UP. How can he speak of transparency out of one side of his mouth and say that he would be crucified if he open the books showing what he found. What was before him,(in the books)was NOT made by him so what the heck IS he trying to do here? Doesn't make sense.Unless he is doing a whitewash on them.

  20. Sharon Selman Foster
    November 4, 2013 at 6:27 pm

    I noticed that every time I or someone said something That they did not want to address, They simply didn't. They simply did not answer. No matter how many times it was brought up.I am one that always looks for the ray of hope. That wants to belive the best. But I just felt played.

  21. Sharon Selman Foster
    November 4, 2013 at 6:36 pm

    Thank you. Please keep us posted as to the next pillow talk with the Center re SAGE.

Leave a comment